Sunday, November 15, 2009

Next six months?(Before june2010 ?)




These days everyone is talking about possible “Major Political Change’ in Pakistan. Analysts are talking about shift of power from presidency to parliament; Shuffling in cabinet due to NRO cases reopening after 28th November. Almost all the political analysts are betting for exit of Asif Ali Zardar by the exception of Nazir Naji and Najam Sethi (who disagree either out of hope! or due to having an insight?).I know it’s always easy to bet against survival of a coalition government but in present situation I think NRO revocation, kickback reports in foreign media for military deals, Anti government vibes coming from local media even though all might be true but have been timed for something bigger and is related to Geo Political and Nuclear significance of Pakistan.

Kickbacks in military deals, corruption in third world countries were never considered unusual but than so was the American involvement in different regions. Apparently Uncle SAM learned it from the failure of Germans and Russians expansion plans that instead of directly ruling the country, rule through its own Military and politicians by keeping them at American payroll.




A very alarming report has come through Dr.Shahid Masood (Meray mutabiq fame).In a recent episode he quoted famous journalist “Seymour Hersh” about presence of American Nuclear security agency on Pakistani soils in spite of so many confirmations through USA foreign office positive statements about Pakistan’s Nuclear Command and Control system’s effectiveness. Considering repute of the journalist (please check a note on him at the end of the blog) let’s assume that American security agency members are actually here but what for? What has changed which made the Americans get closer to Kahoota? Could it be without Military consent? Answer to these and so many other questions are likely to come in the near future and I reckon that it will all be clear before June 2010.Whatever the Americans are up to, either its about Pakistani Denuclearization or restricting Chinese trade through Gwader or both but execution of any anti Pakistani plan cant take place without controlling Army and Political setup. My personal opinion is that under an elected government regime with a balance of power it is not possible so either Americans would keep corrupt political entities in power and try to gain control through them (Rehman Malik’s effort to control ISI by interior ministry) or by supporting such Military elements which don’t retaliate against American interests (Likes of Musharaf).



Under present circumstances it doest seem to be happening through scattered political power and an autonomous Judiciary so the next best alternative is a Caretaker government(based upon technocrats or second line politicians)which would come under the notion “to cover for Political vacuum as a result of corrupt politicians exit(either due to resignation or Assassination). It would last for a period of 2-3 years (enough time to execute American plans i.e. establishing permanent bases in more sensitive and strategic areas and having a share in trade through Gwader)and then leave but I am afraid than there would not be much left to struggle for or to rebuilt.



Please share your opinion about what do you see happening in the next six months. Remember that his blog is a discussion plat form through which we can exchange ideas and opinions. Please extend this address http://inamarif.blogspot.com to your mailing and text lists in order to expand the community.


A note on Seymour Hersh: Seymour "Sy" Hersh made his name and career by reporting in 1969 on the U.S. court martial of Lt. William Calley, the commanding officer in what became known as the My Lai Massacre, an incident in South Vietnam where U.S. soldiers tortured and killed nearly 500 civilians. Hersh won the Pulitzer Prize for the story and became one of the most famous journalists in the country. During the 1970s he reported for The New York Times, creating more controversy with reports on the covert operations of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. Consistently controversial, Hersh has written books that tell of Henry Kissinger's secret bombing of Cambodia, John Kennedy's wild and reckless White House, Israel's behind-the-scenes attempts to get nuclear weapons and General Barry McCaffrey's behavior during the Gulf War. Held in high esteem by many, he is also considered by some to be an unreliable rogue. In 2001 he came under fire by the Pentagon (again) for reporting on military actions in Afghanistan; in 2004 he reported in The New Yorker that Iraqi prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib jail in Baghdad, which focused initially on low-ranking U.S. soldiers (including Lynndie England), could be traced to orders by Donald Rumsfeld -- orders President George W. Bush had been informed of ahead of time. The White House denied the allegations, and Hersh was himself once more the subject of headlines. In August of 2004 he published the book Chain of Command: The Road From 9/11 to Abu Ghraib, based on his magazine reports.

6 comments:

  1. Muhammad farhan zahidNovember 16, 2009 at 12:27 AM

    well your opinion is quite valid as far as current senario is concerned.......and denuclearisation may be a part of the big plan.....yet i feel these corrupt politicians come and go.......soon this bad patch will be over.....we are just made to fight and survive.....the important thing is that we dont have leader to lead us....this makeshift arragement is just going on and on and on.....we indeed need leadership..........

    ReplyDelete
  2. * Political prediction in a country like Pakistan is difficult. In Pakistan only one thing is certain: uncertainty.
    * In my view, none of the rulers of third world is on US payroll. US is successful in manoeuvring the situation in its interest because:
    o These rulers do not have popular support in masses;
    o They are not competent people;
    o Their have lust for infinite political power; etc.
    These weaknesses of these rulers render them a good stuff to use in the interest of Uncle Sam.
    * Some journalists (I mean many journalists) are used to give their news and stories in a manner, which draws popular attraction. I refute the idea that government and military have agreed to denuclearise Pakistan.
    * Two major political powers PPP and PML-N are not in the favour of non-political set-up like Bangladesh model etc. I don’t see the possibility of such a set-up in Pakistan. Mid-term elections or in-house change of government are more likely.
    * In the nest six months following things can happen (keep in mind that only uncertainty is certain in Pakistan):
    o Things will carry on without major change.
    o Abolition of NRO will cause some changes in Gilani’s government.
    o Ousting of Zardari is less probable.
    o There are some chances of Mid-term elections.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks Uzair for sharing your opinion,

    In this post i have mentioned
    US intentions of Pakistan's Denuclearisation and not allowing China to trade freely through Gwader.I feel had it not been for these two reasons than Americans would have been indifferent about what is happening in Pakistan.Just consider how frequently the foriegn Heads of states and their reps are visiting Pakistan and how much are they involved in micro level politics here.I really dont think that they are involved only for theit business partners but i reckon they can forsee strategic changes and want to use Pakistan as a front line state before Americans are done with Pakistan and can shift their focus on Oil rich belt.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree that Pakistan could be important for US due to China and Oil rich belt...But Pakistan is important to US due to Afghanistan also. US politicians, media and think tanks are extremely puzzled, surprised and upset due to Taliban's comeback in Afghanistan. Any change in political scenario in Pakistan, which is not predictable to US, can cause troubles to US in Afghanistan.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Inam its great that you are keeping yourself updated and expressing yourself. I can see that from your older posts, now you are truly emerging as a disticnt writer and polictical analyst.

    Besiders, I personally feel that current scenario does tell us lot of stories and possible corollaries but I dont blame anyone for all this. Our nation as a whole is resposnible for all we see. What we have to do is to inculcate good habits in ourselves and dont just criticize others.

    One suggestion which I think can overcome all this disparity and annouance, hopelessness, frustration etc is that we update the salary structure of bureacracy to market level. I am sure that this change alone will bring wonderful change in all of us and all around us.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for appreciating(Please do mention your name next time)
    As far as your suggeastion for improving salary structure is concerned,I think worst part of corruption in our country has come from the richest in the society so this trend is not likely to change by offering higher salaries even though logically salary should be around equilibrium point.

    ReplyDelete