Tuesday, January 6, 2015

“V” Muslims beyond 2014




I have never really researched or studied to become familiar with Islamic history and fundamentals so I very much represent major part of this country’s population which follows religion according to its own convenience and with very limited knowledge about core Islamic concepts. However like most of my countrymen I absorb religion related info from Elders, Media and Mosque.

I feel that in an Islamic state implementation of Islamic practices and promoting Islam to non-Muslims both within the state and to other states is given primary importance rather than directly focusing on public welfare and giving freedom in terms of sexual practices, female participation in Economic/Educational/Media/Sports activities the way it is done in non-Islamic states.

I really do not think that current co-education system, cable channels, cinema, concerts, working women, Interest based banking fits in an Islamic state so practically if today our society ACTUALLY becomes Islamic than there would be no females on T.V, No films. Females would have little chance of joining any activity in which they have to leave their houses everyday and remain unaccompanied from their family males like for getting education or for work/play.
Holy Prophet used all types of strategies for spreading Islam like he preached as well as fought wars, Made contracts when he was dominant (in worldly terms) or when he had to make compromises for surviving and for larger interest of religion .Holy prophet chose appropriate course of action while keeping the broader picture in mind so he displayed both tolerance and courage .
Now a days most of the people who are recognized in the society by being associated with religion either through preaching or through Jihad generally fail to reflect their role model in behavior (they do not show a kind character while remaining Firm for the cause and they also tend to follow Islamic practices without truly understanding true spirit of many Islamic orders thus appearing backward in modern times paradoxically while promoting a religion which is meant to survive till the end of time and which concluded God’s orders for mankind).

As an individual I am not clear about which option is better to bring Peace and welfare in Pakistan which seems to be disturbed due to conflict between two different types of Muslims i.e. Moderates (who appear to have more casual approach towards religion and who feel that it is ok to have in the society performing Arts, Women participation in social and economic activities and Interest based banking) and Fundamentalists(who want to follow and make others follow Islamic orders as the words of the order suggest without much digging about philosophy behind the order).

Available options for our society are

1: keep the country constitutionally Islamic while keeping the current media,banking and social policies? (This way “V” will stay away from Xtreme unislamic practices like use of pork, alcohol and having boundryless sexual freedom but major part of the society would be able to follow a lighter version of Islam thus modernism would be added to religion HOWEVER this approach is based upon hypocracy as Limits imposed by religion are crossed this way rather than just being stretched).

2:Change the constitution and make Pakistan a Secular state (With religion off the priority list everyone would focus on required economic /social contribution. People with rich foreign exposure indicate that they are more comfortable to practice Islam while living abroad where they find equality ,rule of law and economic prosperity HOWEVER in western societies absolute freedom has shown gradual change/deterioration in moral values like growing same sex bonding ,diminishing sanctity of close relations, use of drugs etc).

3: Decide to make Pakistan an Islamic state where as a society no compromise will be made on fundamental elements/practices of Islam ( This way pain of living would become easier to bear as “V” would know that eventually “V” would be rewarded by God. There can be collective welfare through Islamic practices like lower crime rate due to stricter Islamic punishments etc HOWEVER transition towards a pure Islamic state can be a real test of beliefs and patience. Urban women might be resistant against reduced freedom of movement, work and sports. A society which is so fond of Hollywood and Bollywood might find it tough to quit movies of their favorite stars like Shah Rukh Khan or Jenifer Lawrence. It is debatable if suggested (highly emphasized by religious groups) practices for Muslim males like keeping beard, exposing ankles etc are actually part of the core Islamic practices. Except for acknowledging existence of fundamental beliefs/practices related to God, Holy Prophet, five prayers, Pilgrimage, Zakat and Fasting there is a huge difference of opinion on ways of practicing Islam and believers from different Islamic groups can become violent while advocating and pushing their style of practicing Islam. People belonging to different sects are very less tolerant and open to accommodate other sects. Due to these reasons only very basic elements of Islam can be collectively implemented like Interest free banking, Dress code for women etc.

I personally feel that option one would prevail but it would push both type of extremism i.e. religious and Anti religious. As a society “V” would suffer because neither Islam is likely to penetrate through characterless people (remember currently Amir Liaqat Hussain and Maulana Fazal urRehman/Abdul-Aziz type of people are supposed to be religious opinion makers) nor economy would progress with so much Law and Order related mess and brain drain.

Please share your opinion by adding comments that which option would you go for.

2 comments:

  1. Mr Qasmi,
    You yourself mentioned about how the 'Holy prophet chose appropriate course of action while keeping the broader picture in mind so he displayed both tolerance and courage' I think we need to focus on the Quran and the Prophet's CORE beliefs when making decisions about the future of Pakistan. This is mainly because this country was founded upon Islam and so it would be best to follow it. Also, these days the line between what is Sunnah and what is not is blurring and we cannot be completely sure about the specifics of what the Prophet did or didn't do. But the thing that remains is the Prophets CORE beliefs which were based on the Quran. The Prophet chose the 'appropriate course of action while keeping the broader picture in mind' and so, while referring to the Quran we need to do the exact same as we make decisions that could change the future of Pakistan.
    Sincerely,
    Kitty Cute

    ReplyDelete
  2. It’s good to know that people in civil society are also intellectually engaging in today’s glaring issues. At least you are not committing the mistake of keeping your eyes closed and waiting for a miracle to happen for bringing a change in mindsets and beliefs. You are doing your bit. It’s commendable.
    As far as the issue of “how much Islam” is concerned I believe that the actual issue is that one of the two groups that you mentioned is indifferent and the other group believes that Islam is all about preaching. Why not start from one self? Why not study Islam not in order to preach but in order to practice? The Holy Prophet himself practiced first what he preached. In my view far better results for the society can be achieved this way. If we ourselves become good role models, we would be preaching by practicing. Options of Islamic/interest free banking are also available in the society. Definitely, it requires a lot of patience and perseverance. How about starting it today?

    ReplyDelete